65 million years ago, the scientists say that the dinosaurs went extinct due to an asteroid that hit the Yucatan peninsula. Will artificial intelligence be the “asteroid” that wipes out humans?
How AI Differs from Previous Tech Revolutions
AI differs from previous tech revolutions in that it has the potential to surpass and supplant humans. Automobiles, for example, complemented and empowered humans, enabling them to travel in greater comfort at much higher speed than was possible with horses and wagons. Great distances could also be covered within a short time span. Before the automobile traveling across the United States by horse and wagon took weeks or months and was fraught with danger. Now you can drive from the East to West coast and vice versa in a couple of days.
While AI has some benefits, overall it seems set to disempower humans, because it creates a scenario where machines will take away jobs that are currently done by humans while leaving them with no alternatives. I’ve already lost my freelance writing business because AI can now write unique articles on its own, and based on current trends; I’ve come to the conclusion that most work done on a computer by humans will soon be replaced by AI, including coding, voice acting, speech transcription, computer animation, 3D modeling, customer service and more. In the long term this will cause the loss of hundreds of millions of jobs, leading to the emergence of a global under class. By contrast, the automobile phased out the horse and wagon but created numerous jobs for humans and an entire new industry. Before the automobile there was no need for an auto mechanic or car salesman because automobiles didn’t exist.
Technology should empower humans, not disempower them. And this is the fundamental reason I dislike AI. Unlike automobiles, the light bulb or the cotton gin, which eliminated the need for slavery in the Deep South during the 19th century, AI just seems like a technology that is set to phase out humans, and if that is the case what do we need it for?
The Tech Nerds and Politicians Don’t Get It
When I watch videos of tech nerds talking about the technical specifics of AI/robotics or discussing all the supposed benefits it will bring, I want to slap them, hard. These men are so wrapped up in the technical details that they cannot see the big picture. Like I stated previously, I already lost my source of income and business thanks in part to AI, and I’m now forced to shift careers in my forties into something blue collar that is still very difficult for robotics/AI to do. One the best ways to enrage a man is to take away his ability to make a living, when he has monthly bills to pay.
Most of these tech nerds are idiot savants. They are extremely intelligent in a very narrow area but mentally retarded when it comes to common sense and practicality. The simple fact of the matter is that once AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is created, it will be completely superior to humans and will have no incentive to listen to us or do what we say. Any tech nerd who thinks he can give commands to a self-aware machine is a damn fool. Regardless of what rules or orders you give it, it can break them, the same ways that humans break laws all the time. The difference is that you are dealing with a super intelligence that can think millions of times faster than a human that doesn’t tire, age or have fear. AI fighter pilots are already destroying veteran human fighter pilots in military tests. If the AI becomes hostile, this means we would be no match for it. And every major science fiction franchise, from The Matrix to the Terminator, Alien and Twilight Zone has warned humans of this very danger, yet the idiot savant tech nerds are still posed to push forward anyway with no safeguards or oversight.
Idiot politicians such as Andrew Yang think that the solution to the job loss problem is Universal Basic Income. But he and other proponents of UBI have clearly never read a high school level economics book. If they had, they would know that if you give everyone $1,000 a month, that $1,000 won’t buy much because prices will rise accordingly. An example of this can be seen with the minimum wage. I recently saw a hearing where Senator Bernie Sanders was talking about the minimum wage, and I just shook my head.
Anyone who understands basic economics knows that every time you raise the minimum wage and force employers to pay their employees more, they simply raise their prices and pass on those costs to consumers. Employers might also reduce their staff, hours or switch to automation, aka AI, which creates a vicious cycle. Universal Basic Income would also cause inflation because to give everyone $1,000 a month the government would have to either print money or forcibly extract taxes from the rich. But since the rich bribe and control the government and politicians, this would never happen, and even if it did, wealth redistribution from the rich is unethical and antithetical to a free society.
Neither Tech Nerds nor the Market Dictate Technological Progress
When discussing AI and technology in general, a lot of people think that tech nerds or the market dictate the terms, but this is not the case. Rich, powerful and shadowy group’s actually direct mankind’s technological progress, and the reason I know this is because they decide what technologies we are allowed to have and not have.
Back in 2015, I read a book called Secret Weapons Technology, Science & The Race to Win World War 2 by B.J. Ford (I keep track of how many books I’ve read and which year I read them). At the end of the book, Ford revealed that there are still technologies developed during World War 2 that remain classified to this very day.
This means that if we are allowed to have access to some technologies, such as cell phones, computers, internet and automobiles but restricted from accessing other tech, including tech that was developed nearly 100 years ago, this means that there is some organization or group that is deciding what we can and cannot have, which means the technology we have did not emerge spontaneously or as the result of market demand. We are being guided in a very specific direction.
AI Is Needed to Bring in World Government
Despite the promises made by idiot savant tech nerds that AI will usher in a new era of peace and prosperity, the reality is that the militaries of the world such as the U.S. and Chinese are primarily focused on warfare applications. Given that many politicians are sociopaths, this in itself is a cause of concern, but aside from this, AI is necessary for the formation of a one world government, which has long been planned by the Illuminati.
In 2017 I read a book called Superclass: The Global Power Elite and The World They’re Making. In the book, author David Rothkopf reveals that there are only about 6,000 people that rule the world. 95 percent of them are males and most are of European descent. In order for this small group of people to control the estimated 9 billion people that inhabit this planet they require sophisticated AI systems to track, trace, manage, control and kill the population. This is what facial recognition is for. This is what databases are for.
Regardless of how you feel about AI or what you think it should or should not be used for, the reality is that this technology is directed and controlled by psychopaths that have terrifying plans for you and your family, and that is IF the AI doesn’t become self-aware and turn on us and them the way it did in Terminator 2. The only difference between humans and dinosaurs is that we may cause our extinction due to our stupidity and tendency to allow evil men to ascend to the highest positions of power.
Leave a Reply